FARM SOURCED · EVIDENCE EXPLAINEDEvidence should make a claim smaller, clearer and checkable.
Zaivik’s verification framework connects product claims to the applicable source, lot, sample, method, panel, reporting limits and date. It is a working disclosure—not an independent certification—and each product page remains the source of truth for what is currently available.
What does Zaivik verification mean?
It means Zaivik keeps source, farm-practice, sampling, laboratory and handling records as separate forms of evidence and states which are available for a product or batch. A purchase-ready product is not automatically represented as certified, residue-tested or approved for every possible claim.
What is operational today?
The framework applies to Zaivik food products, but its individual checkpoints can have different maturity and publication status.
Source and lot identity
Approved supplier, FPO or farmer information and receiving records keep an incoming lot identifiable.
Farm-practice records
Cultivation inputs and field observations are being standardized across participating farm and FPO relationships.
Sampling standard
The public sampling plan is being reviewed before it is represented as a uniform programme across products.
Laboratory evidence
A report is disclosed only for the named sample, method, panel, reporting limits and date.
Receiving and pack records
Accepted lots remain connected to receiving, handling and packing information within the operational system.
Customer batch lookup
Only records approved for public disclosure appear in the batch trace experience.
A result must lead to a controlled action.
Release
A batch can be released only through the applicable operational approval route. A test result is interpreted against the stated requirement and decision rule.
Hold and investigate
A concern pauses the batch while identity, sampling, result and process records are checked. Retesting must follow a defined reason, not continue until a convenient result appears.
Reject or correct
A batch that does not meet the applicable requirement is rejected, otherwise controlled or corrected according to the approved process and legal obligations.
MRL, LOD, LOQ and “not detected” answer different questions.
The applicable legal limit for a named pesticide and food combination. It is not the same as a laboratory reporting limit.
The lowest level at which a method can reliably detect that an analyte may be present under stated conditions.
The lowest level at which a method can quantify an analyte with stated performance.
The analyte was not reported at or above the stated method capability in that sample. It does not prove absolute molecular zero.
A bounded answer about the identified record.
A source record can establish a documented source relationship. A farm record can describe reported practices. A laboratory report can establish what the stated method measured in the submitted sample for the listed panel.
A universal guarantee about the food.
No single record proves every safety, nutrition, authenticity, environmental or farming claim. “Not detected” remains limited by the sample, analyte list, method and reporting capability.
Standards and methods come before marketing language.
- World Health Organization — Pesticide residues in food
- FSSAI — Manuals of Methods of Analysis for Food Products
- Codex Alimentarius — International Food Standards
Version 0.1 · Published 9 September 2026 · Review when the sampling standard or programme status changes. Material corrections follow the Zaivik corrections policy.