Public standard · Plain language

Editorial policy

How Zaivik separates evidence, interpretation, field observation and brand standards.

01

Primary sources first

Regulator, court, standard and peer-reviewed material takes priority. Competitor marketing is never treated as independent evidence.

02

Two-person review

High-risk safety, health, regulatory and named-incident content requires research review plus the relevant scientific or legal review.

03

Status words matter

Allegation, investigation, finding, recall, charge, conviction and acquittal are not interchangeable.

The complete policy

What to expect, step by step.

01

Primary sources first

Regulator, court, standard and peer-reviewed material takes priority. Competitor marketing is never treated as independent evidence.

02

Two-person review

High-risk safety, health, regulatory and named-incident content requires research review plus the relevant scientific or legal review.

03

Status words matter

Allegation, investigation, finding, recall, charge, conviction and acquittal are not interchangeable.

04

Authorship must be real

Zaivik names the responsible editorial entity and does not assign an individual byline, qualification or reviewer credit unless that person actually completed and approved the work.

05

Recipes keep their purpose

A recipe first answers the cooking question. Source and pesticide-residue context is added only where relevant, in a clearly labelled module that preserves evidence scope and does not turn food education into fear.

Need clarification?

Bring us the page and the question.

Ask about the source, scope or wording, or report a material error with the exact page URL and supporting record.

Contact Zaivik